1-877-660-3735

Blog email subscribe

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Product Review Vendors – Solutions to Fit Your eCommerce SEO Needs

Posted by Everett Sizemore on August 22nd, 2013

Filed Under:

Share This Post:

Star Ratings
The aim of this post is to help you choose the right solution for adding product reviews to your eCommerce website with a focus on search engine optimization. It is a very long article. I suggest grabbing a cup of coffee before you dive in, or skip down to the summary at the bottom for a quick overview.

Table Of Contents

 

Before we get into platform-specific options I’d like to cover the platform-agnostic vendors that offer product review solutions for just about any online store, regardless of how it is built.


BazaarVoice Logo Bazaarvoice
This is the company I’ve had the most experience with. When implemented a certain way, which is not out-of-the-box, BazaarVoice is a very good review platform. I recommend going with the version of this solution that includes the review content on the product page, and blocking the reviews subdomain (more on that below). Depending on your implementation, the review content may end up going inside a hidden div or a noscript tag on the product page in addition to the viewable content pulled in by the BV script, or via an iframe. In a perfect world the content would appear in the code and on the page without noscript tags or hidden divs, but we can’t always get what we want. I will share examples of several different types of implementation below.

Bottom Line: If you view the source code of the page and use the browser’s search feature to look for a phrase from one of the reviews showing on the page you need to be able to actually see the words in the code. If you can’t find the review in the code then it is not helping your product page rank better, nor is it helping you obtain the coveted star ratings and review count on the search engine result pages (SERPs). This goes for all of the solutions for product reviews.

However, even if you can find the reviews in the source code that doesn’t mean you are free and clear. Many times the review will exist in multiple locations, including elsewhere on your domain, and/or on the vendor’s own website. In the case of BazaarVoice, reviews are going to show up several times on your own subdomain, often called “reviews” by default, but I believe the name can be changed. Not only will the content be on the product page and the reviews subdomain page for the product, but it will appear on several category pages on the reviews subdomain as well. This is why I block the reviews.yourdomain.com subdomain from being indexed, and often from even being crawled (if crawl budget is a concern, as it is for most large eCommerce sites). This way the only version of the review is the one on the product page, assuming it appears in the code on that page and is not just pulled in from a script. Not everyone agrees with this approach, however. Assuming you can get the reviews subdomain ranking (you will need to put in some effort here in most cases), it could be a good way to tap into searchers who are in the researching phase of the buying cycle. This is what Petco.com does (see screenshot below)…

Petco Reviews Serps

Thanks to Jeff Carpenter for this example.

* BV also has a Q&A product that creates duplicate content by reproducing content, sometimes including the product description, on a “questions and answers” subdomain. For the most part, the examples and recommendations for BV’s product review solution go for their Q&A product as well.

Now let’s have a look at a few different implementations and weigh the pros and cons of each.

Ashford.com – Luxury Watches, Jewelry and Accessories
In their partnership with BazaarVoice, Ashford has done some things really well while dropping the ball on one major issue. Overall, their implementation is SEO-friendly, though they need to keep the duplicate review and product content found on their reviews.ashford.com subdomain from being indexed. To highlight the one major issue with their implementation of BazaarVoice, here is a screenshot of a Google search with 30 results for a quote from one of the reviews…

Ashford Reviews Duplicate Content

The only up-side I can see with having review content duplicated elsewhere would be the ability to get different types of enhanced listings, such as the video thumbnail shown here for the product page, in addition to the star rating shown on the product review page in position #4. However, for an ecommerce site I think it would be much more preferable to have a star rating on a product page, and to remove the additional click to purchase. Either way, the additional listing type is not worth the duplicate content problem. If the client really wants multiple types of enhanced listings for a product in this way it would be better to only show the product review content on the review subdomain so at least it isn’t duplicated.

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the indexable content on an Ashford product detail page and an Ashford product reviews page. Keep in mind much of this content is duplicated on dozens of other pages within the Ashford reviews subdomain provide by BazaarVoice as well…

Duplicate content on Ashford

Ashford.com actually has one of the better review site implementations that I’ve seen because they are getting some key things right. For one, we’ve already seen in the SERPs screenshot above that they have implemented microformatting markup for videos and aggregate review ratings, which are showing up on Google. Something else they are doing right is having the review content appear within the code on their product pages, which is something many eCommerce sites miss out on. If the reviews subdomain were to be blocked I think Ashford would have a fantastic implementation of the BazaarVoice product. Here’s one more screenshot to round off this example before moving on to a site that doesn’t even have the review content on their product pages.

BazaarVoice Code on Ashford Website

 

Samsung.com – Electronics and Appliances
The web team at Samsung US has taken an interesting approach to the implementation of BazaarVoice reviews. Instead of putting the review section on the product page URL the “reviews” tab on Samsung product pages will take the user to another page by appending “-reviews” to the product page URL. While the “…-reviews” page is indexed in Google, the actual review content remains unindexable on this page because it is pulled in from a snippet of javascript without any alternate versions in noscript or hidden div tags. The only indexable version of a product review on Samsung.com is found on the reviews.us.samsung.com subdomain.

For every product Samsung has a half-dozen different URLs, all indexable, without any rel canonical tags or robots noindex tags. The ones we’re concerned with in terms of product reviews in this particular example are as follows:
http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN85S9AFXZA – Indexable, canonical product page with one or two reviews that seem to be hand-picked. These are indexable and duplicated on the reviews subdomain.
http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN85S9AFXZA-reviews – Indexable, non-canonical product review page without any “real” content, as everything is pulled in using javascript. Instead of using the noscript tag to show search engines and non-script-enabled users the actual content, they show an iframe of the following URL…
http://reviews.us.samsung.com/7463/UN85S9AFXZA/samsung-85-class-uhd-s9-series-smart-tv-reviews/reviews.htm – Indexable product reviews page. This subdomain is the only part of Samsung’s website where the reviews can be found. Due to the duplicate content issues inherent with the BazaarVoice reviews subdomain you end up with dozens of pages where the review can be found from search, none of which are the actual product page…

Samsung Dup Content SERPs Screenshot

 

We see similar situations with other BazaarVoice clients from Walmart and Sears to Chico’s and Gaiam. It is possible to get it right, and this is a great product when you do, but very few businesses seem to get there. Here is some advice on how to approach a BazaarVoice Reviews implementation.

  1. Ensure the actual review content appears in the code when you “view source” on the product page. I think the folks within BV refer to this as “in-line SEO” or “in-line reviews”. This can appear within a “display none” or “noscript” tag if needed. You do not want the review content on the product page to be in an iframe. The content you actually see on the page is being pulled in via javascript, which is why the content isn’t in the code with most implementations.
  2. Block the reviews subdomain from being indexed. I would do this from the robots.txt file on that subdomain. One could argue that it would be good to let search engines “crawl” but not “index” the domain, but I think that would waste an enormous amount of crawl budget. One could also argue all kinds of other reasons to leave that subdomain indexable, but we can discuss the pros and cons (mostly cons) of this in the comments if you like.
  3. Mark up the aggregate review ratings using a micro-format to obtain an enhanced search listing for product pages. Hreview seems to work well for now, but I think Schema.org markup is going to be the long-term winner.
  4. If you’re going to use tabbed displays on product pages make sure the URL doesn’t change when a new tab is selected. It is OK to append a hashtag to take the user to another section of the page, or to display a previously-hidden div, but changing the URL or adding parameters could cause major duplicate content issues. If you absolutely have to append something to the URL (e.g. ?tab=reviews) the next tip is doubly important…
  5. Use rel canonical tags.

OR – You could go with the PetCo type of implementation if you plan on building the trust and authority of the reviews domain to rank for keywords shoppers use earlier in their buying cycle. In this case you would…

  1. Not have the reviews indexable on the product pages. Writing useful, unique product descriptions becomes even more important if you lack user-generated content.
  2. Link to the reviews subdomain from category pages and, if possible, get quality external links to build up the authority of this subdomain, as it probably will not rank well or get many links on its own.
  3. Keep the category pages on the reviews subdomain from being indexed (leave them crawlable), as they are rife with duplicate content (see screenshots above).

Warning Update: I just got off the phone with a technical support rep. from BazaarVoice and was told they were about to roll out a new solution that clients could opt-into. In his words, it would “Look at the user agent and if it was a search engine we would show the review content inside a noscript tag, and if it was anyone else we would not include the content in that way.” This is the very epitome of cloaking. Even if the “intent” behind this cloaking is above-board, a bot is not going to know your intent. It will, however, see that what you serve Googlebot is different than what you serve everyone else, and that is a very, very bad idea. My hope is that this representative was mistaken. 

Power Reviews LogoPowerReviews
This company is now owned by BazaarVoice. It will be interesting to see how the features of PR are integrated into the BV product. My guess is BV will take some of the great social features from PR, such as the community leaderboards and Facebook integration. Like BazaarVoice, Power Reviews can be implemented either well or poorly. Here are two quick examples…

Skechers.com – Shoe Store
The Skechers store is also listed as a case study on the BazaarVoice website though they are using Power Reviews currently. Unfortunately for Skechers, the review content does not appear in the code on product page, and is duplicated across several pages within the Power Reviews directory instead…

Skechers SERPs
And here is what Google sees when looking at the “Reviews” tab on a Skechers product page:

Skechers Product Page

shop.advancedautoparts.com – Advanced Auto Parts

Finally a store that gets it right! Each product page URL has the propensity to bloat with URL parameters like navigational paths, but they take care of this well with a rel canonical tag. Advanced Auto Parts illustrates that it isn’t the vendor so much as the implementation. I tried a dozen different products and the only page to show up for a snippet from one of the reviews was the actual product page, which often sported an aggregate star rating.

Advanced Auto Parts Reviews in SERPs

How do they do this? It is a revolutionary idea! Just put the review content that appears on the product page within the code of the product page just like you would do with any other content, as shown below…

Inline SEO From Power Reviews

Pluck Logo

Pluck
This company boasts a ton of social and commerce engagement feature, but we’re going to focus mostly on reviews for the purpose of this post. As a review platform, Pluck is one of the better ones I’ve seen in terms of SEO. The review content is on the page, in the code, and nowhere else. It doesn’t require a URL change to show the review content, with most stores opting to show it in a tabbed display that may or may not add a benign “#” to the URL when clicked.

The microformat used for product review markup seems to be up to the store, with some opting for Schema.org markup, some using hReview, and others having none at all. This would make sense, as one of the features Pluck brags about on their “Why Us” page is complete customization:

“No two Pluck deployments are the same, for good reason. We didn’t build Pluck to accommodate our vision of a brand social experience. We built it to support your vision. Pluck gives you complete control over the customer experience you deliver to your audience.”

As with most product page review solutions, Pluck can be deployed well or poorly from an SEO perspective. Let’s look at a few of them below…

 Target.com – Big Box Store Reviews
Target has marked up their Pluck-powered reviews with Schema.org markup, though at present it does not seem to be generating any enhanced listings for them. The review content is placed in the code on the product page, and is indexable. However, some of the review content is also located on category pages and shows as a pop-up window when the user clicks the (#) next to the average star rating for the product (see below). The review content on category pages is also indexable, and partially duplicate of the product page review content.

Target Dup Content in SERPs

I would recommend not putting the review content in the code on category pages, especially since it is not visually prominent in the first place. The content could just as easily show in a pop-up window if it were pulled in via javascript, thus eliminating the duplicate content problem. Below is a screenshot of how the content is displayed on category pages, which would look the same when done with javascript…

Target Review Content

 


BlackAndDecker.com
 – Black & Decker Power Tools

In regard to Pluck and SEO, Black&Decker is doing two things differently from Target.com (one good, one bad). These are what I’d like to cover below.

#1 Black&Decker does not show review content on category pages, thus eliminating the huge duplicate content problem faced by Target, as illustrated in the screenshots above. However…

#2 Unlike Target.com (which has only a minimal deployment on their mobile site), Black&Decker has deployed the full user-generated-content profile section for reviewers. This creates a section on the site (…/My-Black-and-Decker/) in which reviewers have their own profile page, sort of like a social network. In theory, this is great. It incentivizes shoppers to become brand enthusiasts and participate in conversations about the products, thus providing free user-generated content and other benefits to the store. In reality, however, very few brands (Amazon.com being one of them) can pull this off. What you end up with instead of a thriving community of brand enthusiasts is a bloated site with thousands of thin-content user profile pages like this one:

Empty Reviewer Profile on BlackandDecker.comPages like this present a problem in a post-Panda SERP landscape. This is especially true when, like Black&Decker, you have about 126,000 of them indexed on Google. For most brands I would recommend not rolling that out as a feature unless you are going to go out of your way to incentivize participation and create a community. This would include hiring a community manager and keeping unfinished profiles (such as the one in this screenshot) from being indexed. If you do end up rolling out these pages, and most of them are thin-content such as this, I highly recommend blocking the directory from being indexed using the robots.txt file. This will allow visitors to use the feature on the site without bloating the index with hundreds of thousands of thin-content pages.

Mothercare.com – Strollers (prams), Baby Clothing and Toys in the UK
This popular UK baby store has a fairly straight-forward implementation of Pluck reviews. The review content appears in the code on product pages, and is not duplicated on category pages.

Like Black&Decker, Mothercare uses the “personas” feature from Pluck, which they leave indexable. This results in about 60+ pages of thin content being indexed on Google, nothing that would cause a site like this to be penalized or filtered, but which will surely grow over time. Again, in theory these pages are great. You can follow/friend other shoppers, write your own personal shopping blog, keep track of your reviews, earn badges, share photos… On the left side below is how Pluck shows ones of these pages with an active user that has an engaging profile. On the right is how it is probably going to look on 99% of sites out there:

Mothercare's Pluck Profile

To be fair, Pluck has built a robust, beautiful, useful product. It’s not their fault of most clients take a set-it-and-forget-it attitude toward community building. Certain types of eCommerce sites do really well with this sort of thing. For instance, any site that sells cooking products should consider something like this so users can share recipes. And really hard-core collectables are also a promising niche for this type of brand-specific, on-site community. See these creepy interesting and active “Barbie collector” profiles on a site that sells Barbie Dolls for an examples user-generated “Pluck persona” content worth having indexed (images link to profiles):

Pluck Personal Profile Page

eCommerce Personal Profile

 

Reevoo LogoReevoo

This company takes a slightly different approach than those above in that they also feature product reviews on their own website, and clients can show reviews left for the same product on other stores in the Reevoo neetwork:

“These consumer reviews, recommendations and conversations have been gathered and shared by Reevoo on behalf of over 185 leading brands. As part of the network, these businesses share their social content and benefit from content that has been shared by others.”

Yes, some of the reviews on their site will also appear on your site, BUT these reviews are located on the mark.reevoo.com subdomain, which is completely blocked in their robots.txt file:

Reevoo's Robots.txt File

Many Reevoo customers don’t actually rely on the vendor for most of the product reviews shown on their website. I found several that used BazaarVoice, for instance. Some businesses, including ebuyer.com, do seem to be using Reevoo as their primary means of collecting and displaying product reviews on their eCommerce site. However, there are at least three very prominent links to Reevoo from the ebuyer product pages. For most users these are going to bring up a lightbox window, rather than actually taking the visitor to Reevoo.com, but the branding does seem a little distracting. Count the Reevoo logos on this page, for instance.

What I like about Reevoo is that eCommerce stores can have the best of both worlds: The “Revoo Mark” product allows businesses to display reviews for the product that were left elsewhere (great for sites with low review volume of their own), yet avoid duplicate content issues and keep their own reviews unique on their site. This is because only the reviews left on the merchant’s own site will be indexable via the “Revoo Traffic” product, whilcl the rest are displayed in a lightbox window, and are not indexable by search engines.

Reevoo Screenshot

Reevoo could be an interesting option for stores that want to display user reviews that do not yet have many of their own, or for those who want to leverage the supposed “trustworthiness” of the “Reevoo Mark”.


Yotpo LogoYotpo

I decided to add Yotpo after one client and two colleagues mentioned that they used them. The first thing I did was check to see if the content or the reviews was showing up in the code on product pages, or if it was being pulled in from javascript, or in an iframe, etc… The content does not show up in the code view so I was ready to leave it there, but then I found something interesting…

While looking at Google’s cache of this page I could clearly see that they had indexed the content, even though it wasn’t in the “source code view” on either the product page, or on the cache preview. Was Google Preview Bot executing the javascript on the page to render the review content?

Carbon Fiber Gear’s reviews were bringing up the product page in the SERPs. However,  Car Part Kings’s reviews were not. Instead, the reviews subdomain was showing up. After looking into the issue it seems as though the only difference in implementation is that Car Park Kings was appending a (?___store=cpkdefault) parameter to the end of the URL set as canonical by the reviews page – while Carbon Fiber Gear, and other Yotpo clients, set the rel canonical tag as the product detail page.

What this means is: Even though the Yotpo review content does not appear in the code on the product page it is still getting “credit” for that content, and the content is being cached by Google, because (I assume) it does appear in the code on the reviews page, which has a rel canonical tag pointing to the product page. Very interesting! This has major ramifications for a lot of other review platforms. It seems to work – for now.

Dr. Pete from wrote a fantastic overview of “Rel Canonical” on Moz.com back in April. He mentioned that “rel canonical chains” should be avoided as a best practice, though – technically – they are supposed to work.

Dr Pete Moz Answer

 

Here is Google’s advice [emphasis added]

Can Google follow a chain of rel=”canonical” designations?
Yes, to some extent, but to ensure optimal canonicalization, we strongly recommend that you update links to point to a single canonical page.

 I guess there is a reason for best practices after all…
We’ve notified Car Part Kings about the issue and hope they will be addressing it soon. We will try to update this page with the results when that happens.

 


Gigya Logo

Gigya

This is more of  “plugin” than a full-scale review solution. It leverages social media networks, most often Facebook, to allow users to log in and write a comment / review about a particular product. However, the content of their review, though it appears on the screen, is not crawlable by search engines.

Gigya code screenshot from Pacsun website


Feefo LogoFeefo

Thanks to @mattfieldingSEO on Twitter for suggesting this one. Feefo goes beyond just putting code on your product pages to gather reviews. You feed them data about your customers, including their purchase, email address, etc… and Feefo sends them an email asking for feedback. They also send the merchant lots of useful reports for merchandising, customer service and more.

However, I can’t recommend feefo at this point for two reasons. First, the quality of the reviews seems at times very low, as if non-native English speakers in India or China were hired to leave a bunch or reviews. I’m not accusing them or their clients of actually doing this, but for whatever reasons I found a lot of less-than-stellar reviews on their site, and their clients’ sites. Here are a few examples…

Yours Clothing Feefo Example

The reviews was not so good qualities. ;-)

 

Feefoo Red Bus Serps

The first review reads: “Looking forward to seeing this toy of value bring mono my grandson”. Also, in this example the content on the merchant’s site was non-indexable, leaving feefo.com to rank for their reviews.

The second reason I can’t recommend them is because they put the customer reviews on their own site (see screenshot above). Luckily the content is no longer indexed once it is pushed off of the merchant’s first page on feefo because someone there has applied a rel canonical tag to paginated pages telling Google that the canonical page is always the first page – thus keeping content from subsequent pages from being indexed. I doubt this was intentional, but probably a misuse of the tag.

There are plenty of other review solutions out there that help merchants collect reviews, but which are not actually published on the merchant’s site, or are also published on the vendor’s site. Shopzilla’s “Bizrate” service comes to mind. Generally, even when free, I advise against using such services. Do not give your valuable review content to another company.

I’ve tried to cover all of the major platform-agnostic product review solutions above. If you have another for suggested inclusion please use the comment form and we will look into it.

Below are some platform-specific review options, often in the form of plugins, widgets, and ad-ons – though increasingly as part of the out-of-the-box solution. Let’s start with the most widely used content management system on the planet (by far)…

Wordpress LogoWordPress

Tripwire Magazine has a great post about 10 Useful WordPress Rating Plugins, which I highly recommend, but it covers mostly review plugins designed for bloggers who write about products and services, or for businesses who want to display reviews about their company. Getting product-specific reviews on a WordPress-hosted eCommerce website can be a bit trickier, especially if you are using a non-eCommerce theme, or a custom-built eCommerce theme. If none of the options below fit your needs have your developers look into using the GD Star Rating plugin to get ratings on custom sites.

For the purpose of this article I’m going to stick to a few of the major “frameworks”, “plugins” and “themes” which cover probably cost to 90% of the marketshare in terms of eCommerce-focused WordPress sites. If you know of another plugin, theme or framework that does a better out-of-the-box job handling product page customer reviews please let us know in the comments so we can take it for a test run.

WooCommerce has a pretty good solution for product reviews right out of the box. All you have to do is make sure the “Enable reviews” box is checked under the “Advanced” tab when editing an existing product or adding a new product.

WooCommerce Product Reviews

As with most WordPress-based review/rating solutions, WooCommerce ratings uses the underlying post page commenting functionality of WordPress to achieve individual product ratings. Most of the themes for WooCommerce I’ve seen put the reviews within a tab next to the product description. This means the reviews don’t show up on the page-load visually until the visitor clicks that tab. However, the change of views only adds a named-anchor (#one-of-these) to the URL, which doesn’t create any duplicate content problems via non-canonical URLs. It is also important to note that all of the content appears within the code, and does not appear anywhere else other than the main product page. Below are two examples, including the product page and SERP for each.

Showtime Audio Speakers

Showtime Audio SERPs

Yes, we told them their development site was indexed.

 

Cape Bernier Wine Reviews

 

WP e-Commerce is an “online store plugin for WordPress” from GetShopped.org. This is a very popular and robust plugin, but it falls short on the product views issue. In order to display product “ratings” (not reviews, just ratings) be sure to adjust the Product Settings:

GetShopped Screenshot for Review Settings

Be sure to change the “Show Product Ratings” setting to “Yes” under “Product Settings” in WP-Ecommerce.

I searched their entire gallery of sites hoping to find an example of someone getting star ratings, or combining the ratings feature with reviews (i.e. commentary as opposed to just a star rating) with no luck. There was a moment of excitement when I looked at the City Surf Shops UK site, until I realized they had switched over to WooCommerce, which explains their star ratings in SERPs and commentary reviews on product pages. All I could find were very simple implementations of  the rating feature (see settings screenshot above).

BoutikBoutik Star Ratings

This doesn’t include any markup for enhanced SERPs, nor does it include commentary/review as part of the rating, making it essentially useless for SEO purposes.

 

Cart66 Does not seem to offer this feature. I have a question into their Twitter account manager and am waiting back to hear from them.

 

Shopp is an e-Commerce plugin for WordPress with plenty of useful features. Unfortunately, product page reviews isn’t one of them. Admittedly, I do not have experience with this particular solution, so I scoured the documentation looking for information about how to get product reviews or star ratings, or for Shopp customers who have done this. The only thing I found was a year-old question on the WP Forums in which a Shopp customer asked if she could use the WP Customer Reviews plugin since Shopp didn’t offer reviews out of the box, and another member telling her that, even if she did end up finding a way to do this, it would break the next time Shopp updated, along with a few choice words about their “support”.

I am positive that there are more WordPress related eCommerce solutions out there for collecting and displaying product reviews on an eCommerce site, but I can’t cover all of them. With the exception perhaps of a few up-and-comers that I don’t know about, WooCommerce would be my choice if I was going to operate an eCommerce site on WordPress.


Drupal LogoDrupal

Drupral is one of my weaker spots, admittedly, though I know enough to understand what to look out for.  The thing to be concerned with about modules that allow visitors to leave reviews on a Drupal site is the tendency for each review to create a separate, indexable “node”. You want the review to appear as indexable content on the product page (which is also a “node”), and only on the product page.

There are modules, like Node Vote and Simple Vote, that do not create a new node. However, these are typically only for rating e.g. 4 our of 5 stars) and not for “reviews” or commentary. Other modules, like NodeReview and UserReview, allow both ratings and review comments, but create a new node for every review. Be aware that modifying the code of any module will make it more difficult to update when other bugs or security risks are patched in future updates of the module so you typically want to avoid this.

So far the best solution I have come up with is to use a module that allows visitors to both rate and comment/review, and then to block the review-specific nodes from being indexed, and/or 301 redirect the review nodes to the product page, where the review content also shows. In this way the only indexable version of the content appears on the product page. This can probably be achieved with NodeReview if you wanted to customize the code, but I’ve read in the “Issues” forum for that module about some people (example 1, example 2) having trouble redirecting users back to the product page after they leave a review. Instead the reviewer ends up on the review node page. If you know if a solution – or combination of solutions – that will accomplish the following, please share in the comments so we can update this section with your suggestion (once verifying that it works):

  1. Users can rate and review a product from the product page.
  2. Upon completion of the review they are redirected back to the product page (or can review without ever leaving it).
  3. Preferably the review would not create a new node, but assuming it does (since we can’t find any that don’t)…
    1. The content from each review also appears in indexable form on the product page.
    2. The review-specific nodes can be blocked from being crawled and/or 301 redirect to the appropriate product page.
  4. An aggregate rating is taken from the reviews and included in the code in a micro-format suitable for enhanced SERPs on Google.

Ubercart  is an open source eCommerce solution for Drupal users. This means, theoretically at least, that your developers can alter the code to accommodate any need, including SEO-friendly product reviews. It seems the most common way Ubercart merchants are implementing product reviews is by combining the core Drupal “comment” module, and the Fivestar rating module. Here are instructions on how to set this up.

Drupal Commerce is also an open source eCommerce framework for Drupal. Since we’re not reviewing eCommerce frameworks for Drupal I won’t get into the pros and cons of Ubercart Vs Drupal Commerce, except to say the product review/rating issue for each have many of the same problems and solutions (e.g. using the Fivestar module and comments).

I do not generally recommend Drupal for eCommerce sites, which is why I don’t have much experience with it in that particular situation. If you already have a Drupal site I hope some of the links above can help. Otherwise, it might be better to choose another platform for your store.

While WordPress and Drupal are general “content management systems” that can accommodate just about any type of website, including an online store, the platforms below are strictly focused on eCommerce websites, often making them more expensive, robust, and feature-rich. I can’t possibly cover all of them, but the five below represent the vast majority of marketshare for entry-level to mid-level online retail businesses.

Volusion LogoVolusion

The latest version of Volusion offers a robust product review solution for merchants that is mostly SEO friendly and has other useful features, like average ratings and automated follow-up emails to solicit reviews from real customers. For an out-of-the-box solution it is very good. The one thing you need to look out for is the indexation of pages with a URL containing “ReviewsList.asp?” as this is a duplicate version of the review content found on product pages. There are lots of other ways to address it depending on your situation. For example, you could 301 redirect the ReviewsList.asp?ProductCode=…. URL to the respective product page if those review pages have external links, which is doubtful. You could also use rel canonical tags on the ReivewsList.asp pages, but I don’t think this is an appropriate use of the tag since it isn’t technically the same page (e.g. the product description doesn’t appear on those pages). My advice is to keep it simple and just block the ReviewsList.asp pages from being indexed by adding this to the robots.txt file…

Disallow: /ReviewsList.asp

To be extra safe for all search engines you might consider also adding the following:

Disallow: /ReviewsList.asp?*

Tower Paddles advanced SERPs

Fortunately this is easy enough to fix with a simple robots.txt disallow.

To enable the Review feature in Volusion…

  1. Go to Inventory > Products and select All Products Settings from the Settings dropdown.
  2. Select Enable Customer Reviews.
  3. Click Save.
How to Get Product Reviews in Volusion

Click the image for more detailed instructions from Volusion.

Watch this video series from Volusion to learn more about their product reviews feature.

Magento LogoMagento

The Reviews & Ratings module for Magento, which seems to operate about the same for both “Go” and “Enterprise” merchants, has some unique features that I’ve not found in other out-of-the-box review features. Sadly, it also has some of the SEO-issues typical for review solutions – namely additional, non-canonical URLs. I also could not find any stores that were achieving enhanced star-rating SERPs when using Magento’s default review module.

As with Volusion,my usual Megento review module recommendation is to A: display the reviews on the product page, and B: block the /review/ folder from being indexed.

Deering Banjos is an example of a site that does not show the reviews on the product page, but instead shows them on the review page that gets generated whenever a user leaves a review:

Banjo Product Page

It would be better to have the review content appear on the product page, though they fix half of the issue by using a rel canonical tag on the review page.

Banjo Review Page

This page uses: rel=”canonical” href=”http://www.deeringbanjos.com/goodtime-banjo”

Although the rel canonical tag referencing the product page solves some of the duplicate content problems inherent in this set-up, it is not ideal. Google can, and often does, choose to ignore rel canonical instructions when they feel they are done improperly. In this case the store has their review page ranking instead of the product page, despite the use of a rel canonical tag:

Banjo Store SERPs

In this case the non-canonical page is showing up for the review content.

A better way to approach this would be to display the review content on the product page while maintaining the rel canonical fix they have implemented to deal with “review” page URLs. This is what Zumiez is doing…

Zumize Product Page Reviews

Zumiez puts content from the Magento Review module on their product pages.

Zumiez deals with the product review page duplicate content issue by adding a rel canonical tag to them. For example, this page rel canonicals to this page (the one in the screenshot above). They also do not even show the review content on the review page (only on the product page) which makes this an even safer approach. They would probably rather not even have those pages to begin with, but sometimes you have to work with what the platform vendor gives you.

The ability to allow visitors to review several different aspects of a product (e.g. price, quality, general, value, durability…) makes for a much more interesting set of reviews. This module also collects the reviewer’s name, summary and complete commentary/review in addition to the ratings. However, the added features may also be contributing to the difficulty I’ve seen with Magento sites getting enhanced star ratings in the SERPs…

Magento Ratings Box


BigCommerce Logo
Bigcommerce

Though I have known of Bigcommerce for a couple of years now, it wasn’t until a few months ago that I had the opportunity to look at the back-end of a site that uses this eCommerce platform. My friend’s website, WOD Authority, sells CrossFit gear and he recently asked if I could have a quick look at how he had things set up from an SEO perspective. So far I am very impressed with this platform, and may end up writing an entire post about these guys (OMG clean URLs, alternate product views, user reviews, smart taxonomy, videos on product pages…). But for now let’s just stick with the review stuff…

Bigcommerce shows indexable review content on the product page, and only the product page. They do not change the URL when you select the “reviews” tab on a product page, or when you click “write a review”. Everything happens right there on the product page under one URL, which greatly reduced the possibility of having duplicate review content and/or non-canonical review pages.  They use a five-star rating system out of the box, which will eventually be highly compatible with Google’s enhanced search results. I say “eventually” because there is not currently any micro-formatting of this data and I could not find any examples of Bigcommerce stores showing up with star ratings on product pages in Google SERPs. However, thanks to Andrew Bleakley there is a fix below…

Note: You may want to ask the team at Bigcommerce how this is going to be affected in future updates of the product. My guess is this is something they’re going to be adding in a future release, but until then you don’t want your customization to be overwritten. Also be sure to back up your product.html file before editing!

Open the product.html template and add the code below at the very bottom of the file:

<!– start rich snippet –>
<div id=”richsnippet”>
<div itemscope itemtype=”http://data-vocabulary.org/Product”>
<span itemprop=”brand”>YOUR BRAND</span>
<span itemprop=”name”>%%GLOBAL_ProductName%%</span>
<img itemprop=”image” src=”%%GLOBAL_ProductTinyImageURL%%” />
<span itemprop=”description”>%%GLOBAL_ProductDesc%%</span>
Category: <span itemprop=”category” content=”YOUR CATEGORY NAME“>YOUR CATEGORY NAME</span>
Product #: <span itemprop=”identifier” content=”sku:%%GLOBAL_SKU%%”>%%GLOBAL_SKU%%</span>
<span itemprop=”review” itemscope itemtype=”http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate”>
<span itemprop=”rating”>%%GLOBAL_Rating%%</span> stars, based on <span itemprop=”count”>%%GLOBAL_ProductNumReviews%%</span> reviews</span>
<span itemprop=”offerDetails” itemscope itemtype=”http://data-vocabulary.org/Offer”>Regular price: %%GLOBAL_ProductPrice%%
<meta itemprop=”currency” content=”USD” />
$<span itemprop=”price”>%%GLOBAL_ProductPrice%%</span>
Available from: <span itemprop=”seller”>YOUR NAME OR URL</span>
Condition: <span itemprop=”condition” content=”new”>%%GLOBAL_ProductCondition%%</span>
<span itemprop=”availability” content=”in_stock”>In stock</span>
</span>
</div>
</div>
<!– end rich snippet –>

Assuming you are happy with the small product image and your default currency is $USD you should only have to edit the code in red, which is fairly self-explanatory.

The visual layout of reviews on Bigcommerce product pages is completely up to the merchant. Out-of-the-box it is typically put into a tab on product page, but it can appear below product description text, in a second column, as expanded text within a drop-down section (i.e. display:none / hidden div) or just about any other way your designers and developers can think of to fit the code into the site visually. Here are a few examples…

Ayurnatural Beauty Screenshot

UT Kilts Screenshot

Prymax Vintage

Prymaxe Serps
Unfortunately a cool design doesn’t get you an enhanced search result. You’ll need some type of structured data / microformatting markup for that (e.g. schema.org itemprop aggregate rating).



Zen Cart Logo
Zen Cart

Though certainly not my first choice in eCommerce platforms, Zen Cart is free, open source shopping cart software – and you can’t really beat that in terms of budget. As with any open source platform it is sometimes difficult to tell when bad review implementations are due to the platform, or merchant-error. In this case it seems to be a bit of both, though Zen Cart, in my opinion, makes merchant-errors much more common than many other eCommerce solutions.

Here is a product page from Elegant Eye Glasses, a prescription eyeglass store built on Zen Cart. That particular page, at the time of this post, was not indexed. However, the “reviews page” for that product was. As with most Zen Cart stores that have reviews, you can find several non-canonical versions of the review content starting with the main “Reviews” index page, such as this. None of these problems are address out-of-the-box with potential solutions like robots meta noindex tags, robots.txt blocks or rel canonical tags.

Zen Cart duplicate content

If I were going to pay a developer to fix the problems I might as well shell out the money for a better product in the first place . </ 2 cents>


OS Commerce LogoOS Commerce

Another open source shopping cart platform, osCommerce boasts over 7,000 free “add-ons” and an active community of shop owners helping each other with problems in the osCommerce support forums. However, I cannot recommend osCommerce handles product reviews. It simply sucks. Here is a bulleted list of why OSCommerce sucks for product reviews:

  • The product reviews don’t appear on the product page. They appear on a separate review page instead.
  • Every product has a review “stub page”, whether there are any reviews or not.
    • Since most products in most stores don’t have any reviews, you essentially end up with dozens, hundreds, possibly even thousands of “thin content” pages (i.e. completely or nearly empty of unique or useful content), thus putting your site in danger of being affected by Google’s Panda algorithm.
    • The use of indexable “stub pages” is against Google’s published Webmaster Content Guidelines: “Avoid publishing stubs: Users don’t like seeing “empty” pages, so avoid placeholders where possible. For example, don’t publish pages for which you don’t yet have real content. If you do create placeholder pages, use the ‘noindex’ meta tag to block these pages from being indexed.
  • There is no micro-formatting of structured data to provide context to Google about product reviews.
    • In other words, you won’t get the enhanced search result with the starts that can be so beneficial to your click-thru rate.
  • osCommerce generates a page (or set of pages if they become paginated) called /reviews.php on which a truncated version all reviews for all products are listed, which makes every product review an instant duplicate content problem.

Some of the issues above are elaborated on with the following screenshots…

An osCommerce product page

Why not put product reviews on this page instead of adding several more clicks (the user has to get back to this product page after reading reviews) in the way of a conversion?

OS Commerce Review Stub Page

What is the point of this page?

osCommerce Demo Site SERPs

This is exactly the sort of thing that will get your site filtered by Panda.

I used the osCommerce demo site in the examples above, but you can easily find these rampant issues across hundreds of thousands of other osCommerce customer domains…

More OS Commerce review pages

Click the image or type this into Google to reproduce these results: inurl:reviews.php “read what others are saying”

Some business owners out there may already be using osCommerce, in which case I’d like to offer my condolences constructive suggestions:

  1. Install an ad-on that puts review content onto product pages. This only solves part of the problem, since the content will also exist on the product review page and the review index page, but it’s a start. Here is a product page example on a site that has done this, though they did’t implement the other suggestions below, which means – in addition to the product page in the example link – that review content also appears on the product review page and the reviews index page. Though I can’t vouch for the efficacy of specific osCommerce Add-Ons, you can check into this one and this one and this one.
  2. Either rel canonical or 301 redirect the product review pages that have reviews to the product detail page, or apply a robots noindex meta tag to the html header of the page to keep them from being indexed. This suggestion assumes you’ve implemented suggestion #1.
  3. Block useless, duplicate content, and thin pages (e.g. reviews.php and empty review stubs) from being indexed in the first place. The various ways of doing this, which one would be best for any given situation is beyond the scope of this post. However, a good place to start is this thread on the osCommerce forums. It is a bit dated (2007) but worth looking into, especially given this part of the conversation..
OS Commerce forum conversation

So this BIG problem has been around for over 6 years and still hasn’t been fixed. That is why I don’t recommend osCommerce.


To Make a Long Story Short (the summary)

Just because a review product vendor or eCommerce platform offers a way for merchants to put product reviews and ratings on their site does not mean it is “SEO-friendly”. Sometimes it can even do more harm than good. Fortunately, it seems there are work-arounds that will allow business owners to span the gap between good and great until the vendors reach the next level.

If you need to find a product review vendor that is platform-agnostic I’d suggest BazaarVoice, though you will want to block the reviews domain from being indexed, and you will want the review content to appear on your product page WITHOUT cloaking – That is, you want to show Google the content in the code too. Never, ever, treat Google differently than other visitors. I really hope that rep. I spoke to didn’t know what he was talking about.

You might also look into Pluck, though the “SEO-friendlyness” of the implementation is very much in the hands of your developers.

If you’re using WordPress there are several options. I suggest WooCommerce or WP e-Commerce, but if you’re already using a different eCommerce framework you can look into plugins like WP Customer Reviews.

Drupal users need to get creative, possibly by installing a module such as NodeReview or UserReview, and blocking the individual review nodes from being indexed.

I’m going to lump Volusion, Magento and Bigcommerce into a mid-level eCommerce platform group. Their pricing is similar and each can handle everything from a small mom-n-pop shop to an enterprise-level retail brand. Out of this group I think Volusion has the best product review offering, though you will want to add a simple line to your robots.txt file to make the most use of it. Bigcommerce, unlike Volusion, does not yet allow you to obtain the star ratings without hacking the product.html template code. However, once done I think this is an excellent product in many ways. I can’t recommend Magento if you have the choice, but those using it already can use the work-arounds above to get a decent product review implementation. I do like their multi-faceted approach to ratings though.

Zen-Cart, oSCommerce, and several other platforms that range from free to cheap are typically a case of getting what you pay for. It is possible with any open-source code to get what you want, but by the time you pay a developer to do it you’d be better off spending that money on a more robust product.

A Few Last Words

Having the the technical side of a good product review solution implemented well is only the first step. There are lots of sites out there with well-done product review solutions that don’t have any reviews. Your next step needs to be figuring out the best way to get your customers to leave reviews about your products. One of the easiest ways to do this is to send a follow-up email after purchase. However, you can improve your chances of getting better reviews by segmenting your list and emailing your best customers (i.e. repeat shoppers whose first purchase was X years/months ago, who have spent $x, etc…), or targeting those who have already said their experience was positive. For example, customer service reps can often provide some indication as to whether or not the customer was happy with their purchase. A follow-up email several days after the expected delivery date asking if they were happy with their purchase, or if they have any suggestions has multiple benefits, one of them being that you know who to ask for reviews. Use your imagination, but the important thing is that you don’t just take a “set it and forget it” approach to product reviews because, most of the time, people aren’t motivated to review something unless they were unhappy with the purchase and feel the need to complain about it. That doesn’t mean you should be afraid to offer reviews on your site, or that you should filter out the bad ones. It just means you need to be proactive about gathering positive reviews.

The eCommerce world moves quickly. Review companies and CMS plugins are coming and going all the time, and features are constantly being updated. If you know of another outstanding option please feel free to mention it in the comments below. And if you know that any of the information above has changed since this post, please let us know in the comments, as we’d like to keep this resource as up-to-date as possible.

About 

Everett has served as in-house SEO specialist in diverse corporate and startup environments, as well as running his own agency, learning the needs and roadblocks of clients in eCommerce and other hyper-competitive niches.

Share This Post:

19 Comments on “Product Review Vendors – Solutions to Fit Your eCommerce SEO Needs


    Thank you x 100. We’re actually in the implementation stage of BazaarVoice and you’ve given me a few things to look out for.


    Thanks for the write up, very interesting.

    I do have 1 question though. In the Magento section, you twice mention “enhanced star ratings in the SERPs” and that magento wouldn’t get them, but you never explained what exactly this phrase meant, especially since the phrase was never used to describe the review capabilities of other systems. Is that a reference to metadata enhanced SERP listings?


      Hello Troy,

      I am referring there to the search engine results with star ratings under them as “enhanced SERPs”. It is what you see from PCMag.com in these results.


    Thanks for the mention. Astonishing still that Bigcommerce does not have native support for rich snippets for reviews or products but it isn’t alone, the majority of SaaS shopping cart vendors have yet to implement them even though Google first introduced them in early 2009 (see http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html)


    Nice article and a really helpful overview, although it’s a shame to see Jigoshop wasn’t mentioned alongside WooCommerce…

    Also worth noting that there are some eCommerce specific SEO products out there for WordPress-based sites…


      Thanks Dan. I’m going to look into adding Jigoshop, as well as Feefo.


    Hi Everett,

    Very interesting article, thanks. However, it doesn’t represent how Reevoo actually works and we’d like to have the chance to explain it a bit better for future updates.

    One of the large benefits of Reevoo is the fact that retailers can have reviews available on their sites for products that they haven’t managed to sell yet – therefore increasing the likelihood of being able to sell them. This is possible thanks to the Reevoo network. By allowing the customers to review products on the same facets we can then aggregate these reviews and publish them on the retailers’ website, ensuring in this way a great coverage.

    We group reviews for the same product from all sources together, therefore this cannot be crawl able by search engines. That is why we do the “no follow” that you talk about. Those links are not “To our site” this is a standalone application purely used to host reviews in a lightbox.

    The SEO benefit of reviews has less of an impact than having reviews at all, which is why that is the main usage seen across sites. The “Traffic” reviews are deliberately selected to be unique. We will only have embedded reviews that are generated by that retailer in order to ensure they are unique. If a retailer has only generated one review, we will “ajax” in other reviews that are not crawlable to have a consistent user experience.

    We generally have 3 reviews inline, so that as they refresh, the % content of the retailers’ page that changes is higher, but there are some that required more and we have done so (Kia).

    As part of Traffic, we have rich snippets available as well that the clients do not have to implement themselves, it is part of the tag library.

    These Kia links work though: http://goo.gl/cQQRF3
    http://demo.reevoo.com/seoverflow-article.png

    We also have a Q&A solution that has embedded content, both Dewalt and Acer are using it at the moment: http://goo.gl/4YSdxl

    Happy to chat for a more in depth conversation.

    Cheers,

    The Reevoo Team


      Hello Reevoo Team,

      Thank you for responding to clear some things up. I just want to make sure what I wrote above is accurate so let’s go over them in case they are not:

      #1. I said you also feature the reviews on your website, though they are on the mark.revoo.com subdomain, which is not indexable.
      #2. I quoted the Reevoo website in stating that the reviews have been gathered from a “network” and shared by Reevoo on behalf of over 185 leading brands. Can you tell me if it is possible that more than one website might be displaying, in crawlable form, the same review? This is what I was concerned with, but if you AJAX the shared reviews I can update the section.
      #3. The last paragraph suggests that Reevoo might be a good option for stores that do not have many reviews of their own yet. I think this is essentially a point you were saying here: “retailers can have reviews available on their sites for products that they haven’t managed to sell yet”
      #4. I also had some concern about the quantity of overt Reevoo branding images on the merchant’s site, though I can see how it could be argued that these are “trust symbols”. Personally, I think they take away from the merchant’s brand, but that is just an opinion.

      Thank you for helping me clarify this. I will admit that yours was a difficult one for me to evaluate because it does not work in the same way that most of the others do.

      Best regards,

      Everett Sizemore


        Hi Everett,

        In response to your questions:

        #1. Correct – the mark.reevoo.com subdomain is blocked in the ROBOTS.TXT . Some reviews also appear on our consumer-facing portal shopping.reevoo.com but the vast majority of these are ajaxed, rather than embedded. This consumer-facing portal used to be a large part of our business but is now a small percentage and is also used as a test-bed for development of new SaaS tools. Furthermore, the portal is limited to the Consumer Electronics niche – so reviews from our retail, auto, travel, or finance clients are not posted there.

        #2. To reconfirm, only review content collected from a retailer’s consumers is indexed on their website – so it would never be duplicated on other websites in crawlable form. Reviews are aggregated across the network and presented to consumers in a lightbox, which of course is not crawlable. In this way, we deliver the best of both worlds:

        a) Maximum review coverage (breadth and depth) for our clients, which delivers the largest conversion impact (there is a strong relationship between number of reviews and a product’s conversion rate);
        b) Increased SEO, with reviews embedded once and on the retailer’s own website only.

        Another key strength offered is that we are very good at collecting large volumes of social content – since we proactively solicit reviews from verified purchasers via the emails supplied in periodic purchaser feeds from the retailer. This contrasts with the passive model supported by other review solutions where anyone can post a review – regardless of whether they purchased the product/service or not (a model which is obviously open to abuse). Thru proactive collection, we publish 15 reviews for every 100 review request emails we send out on average. Industry averages are typically for 2-3 reviews to be collected – which is actually the performance we delivered when we first started out.

        Our ability to collect large volumes of reviews (by optimising every step in the process thorugh 100’s of split-tests) underpins all of the above. More reviews means larger conversion uplift, more content to embed more regularly, so superior SEO results, etc.

        #3. To clarify, by leveraging the pool of review content on the Reevoo Network – where reviews for the same product from all sources are grouped together – retailers can populate their product and service pages with consumer reviews without having to wait until they’ve made any sales and collected their own review content. Since more consumer reviews lead directly to higher conversions and more time spent on site, retailers can benefit from more page impressions and increased revenues.

        #4. When selecting a reviews and ratings solution, retailers have two choices: either use an unbranded review solution, or the Reevoo solution. Surveys consistently show that consumers trust a solution more when that service is provided by an independent company, rather than an “in-house” or unbranded solution. More than twice as much in fact. The Reevoo brand images serve as “trust symbols” as you say, and interestingly we have seen strong results in countries where the Reevoo brand is less well known than the UK (where a survey showed 22% brand awareness amongst UK consumers).

        Since there is increasing scrutiny on reviews by consumers, the press and more recently from governing bodies, there is also PR risk for retailers. If dubious practices are identified, the issue typically escalates rapidly. A number of leading brands have now suffered from this:

        – Samsung accused of creating fake reviews (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22166606)
        – Belkin President admits fake reviews and apologises (http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10145399-92.html)
        – TripAdvisor forced to remove “reviews you can trust” slogan from website (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/8760616/TripAdvisor-removes-reviews-you-can-trust-slogan-from-website.html)

        Cheers,

        The Reevoo Team


    I disagree. I prefer to keep our reviews in an iframe and off of the product detail page. I have the review subdomain for ranking on review type search phrases. We also use the strategy of building out high quality unique product descriptions for our products.


      Hello Jeff,

      I assume you’re talking about Bazaarvoice…

      Thank you for commenting. I originally allowed it to operate like that but found that it was more useful to me to have that content crawlable on the product page. The idea at first was that people earlier on in the buying cycle would have a landing page for research-terms like “ProductName Review”. However, without external links and trust that subdomain wasn’t ranking well. This may be different if you’re talking about products that are sold almost-exclusively on the merchant’s site, but going up against Amazon, Bizrate, epinions, zillions…. for products sold everywhere it was very difficult to get those rankings.

      I would not set it up that way, but that is just my own opinion. I’m sure there are plenty of reasons why someone else might want to set it up differently. Like you, I’ve had personal experience with this product, though we have reached different conclusions.

      Thanks again for your response. Great work on the Petco site.


        Thanks for the response. I did find that getting the review site ranked took some extra work, but by linking to relevant pages from category level pages, such as using links on the dog beds page “Read Dog Bed Reviews”, as well as a lightly mentioning the review site in social media, we were able to get the review site ranking for those review type products. Amazon is a competitor, and out ranking them even on a main site requires a lot of work, but getting the review site into that mix is pretty easy.

        This of course all stems from our strategy of creating unique custom content for our product detail page. If I didn’t have the resources to create the high quality descriptions, I would agree that using the reviews in the source of the product detail pages, would be pretty much required to be competitive in the space.


          Jeff thank you for shedding light on how to go about getting the review subdomain ranking for research phrases like “dog bed reviews”. I see you all in the top spot for that search, and can see how that would be very beneficial. Most sites struggle to get even a little bit of original content onto product pages at scale across thousands of products, making user-generated content in the form of reviews on product pages very important. Unfortunately, those same sites have trouble getting shoppers to leave reviews in the first place, so it’s a losing battle for many of them either way. :-/


    WOAH! Thanks for the list Everett. This will surely come in handy. Can’t wait to get to this later tonight. Cheers!


    Great content and exactly what I’m looking into at the moment.
    A related question that isn’t really touched upon above (but has me scratching my head for a while now): what method would you recommend seo-wise for implementing a big number of reviews on the product page. Do you see pagination as an option (using canonical / rel=”prev/next”) or do you think a ‘view all’ page is a better choice?


    Great post Everett! Very insightful and thorough, as always.

    Regards,
    Joynt


    This is awesome Everett! I had seen your Moz presentation and followed all your blogs since I started working with e-Commerce companies and this is just another awesome piece on review and ratings. Thanks for this!


    Hi,

    Great & excelent job about e-commerce !!!

    Thanks Everett

Leave Your Comment, or Contact Everett Sizemore Directly